title: "Development Process" description: "A guide to the development workflow and processes for contributing to Navius" category: contributing tags:
- contributing
- development
- workflow
- process
- guidelines related:
- contributing/README.md
- contributing/testing-guidelines.md
- contributing/code-of-conduct.md
- architecture/project-structure.md last_updated: March 27, 2025 version: 1.0
Development Process
This document outlines the development process for contributing to the Navius framework, including workflows, best practices, and guidance for specific feature types.
Table of Contents
- Development Environment Setup
- Development Workflow
- Branching Strategy
- Code Review Process
- Testing Requirements
- Documentation Requirements
- Working with Complex Features
- Release Process
Development Environment Setup
-
Clone the Repository
git clone https://gitlab.com/ecoleman2/navius.git cd navius
-
Install Dependencies
cargo build
-
Setup Development Tools
- Configure IDE (VS Code recommended)
- Install extensions (Rust Analyzer, etc.)
- Setup linting (rustfmt, clippy)
-
Start Local Development Environment
# Start required services docker-compose -f .devtools/docker-compose.yml up -d # Run the application cargo run
Development Workflow
-
Issue Assignment
- Select an issue from the issue tracker
- Assign it to yourself
- Move it to "In Progress" on the board
-
Create a Branch
- Create a branch from
main
with a descriptive name - Branch names should follow the pattern:
feature/feature-name
orbugfix/issue-description
- Create a branch from
-
Implement Changes
- Follow the code style guidelines
- Implement tests for your changes
- Update documentation as necessary
-
Run Tests
- Run unit tests:
cargo test
- Run integration tests:
cargo test --test '*'
- Check code style:
cargo fmt --check
- Run linting:
cargo clippy
- Run unit tests:
-
Create a Merge Request
- Push your branch to the remote repository
- Create a merge request with a clear description
- Link the related issue(s)
- Request a review from the appropriate team members
-
Address Review Feedback
- Respond to review comments
- Make necessary changes
- Push updates to your branch
-
Merge the Changes
- Once approved, your merge request will be merged
- The CI/CD pipeline will deploy the changes
Branching Strategy
We follow a simplified GitFlow approach:
main
: Stable code that has passed all testsfeature/*
: New features or improvementsbugfix/*
: Bug fixesrelease/*
: Release preparation brancheshotfix/*
: Urgent fixes for production issues
Code Review Process
-
Checklist for Submitters
- Code follows project standards
- Tests are included and pass
- Documentation is updated
- No unnecessary dependencies added
- Performance considerations addressed
- Security implications considered
-
Checklist for Reviewers
- Code quality and style
- Test coverage and quality
- Documentation completeness
- Architecture and design patterns
- Security and performance
- Compatibility and backward compatibility
Testing Requirements
All contributions must include appropriate tests:
- Unit Tests: Test individual functions and methods
- Integration Tests: Test interactions between components
- Property Tests: For complex algorithms or data structures
- Performance Tests: For performance-critical code
Minimum coverage requirements:
- Core modules: 90%
- Utility code: 80%
- Overall project: 85%
Documentation Requirements
All code contributions must be accompanied by appropriate documentation:
-
Code Documentation
- Public APIs must have doc comments
- Complex algorithms must be explained
- Function parameters and return values must be documented
-
User Documentation
- New features need user documentation
- Examples of how to use the feature
- Configuration options
-
Architecture Documentation
- Major changes should include design considerations
- Data flow diagrams for complex features
- API interaction diagrams where relevant
Working with Complex Features
Caching Features
When working with caching features like the Two-Tier Cache:
-
Performance Considerations
- Always benchmark before and after changes
- Consider memory usage and optimization
- Test with realistic data volumes
-
Consistency Requirements
- Ensure proper synchronization between cache layers
- Implement clear invalidation strategies
- Test race conditions and concurrent access
-
Error Handling
- Graceful degradation when Redis is unavailable
- Clear error messages and logging
- Recovery mechanisms
-
Testing Approach
- Mock Redis for unit tests
- Use real Redis for integration tests
- Test cache miss/hit scenarios
- Test cache invalidation
- Test concurrent access
Server Customization System
When working with the Server Customization System:
-
Feature Flags
- Ensure clean separation of features
- Test all combinations of feature flags
- Document impacts of each feature flag
-
Build System Integration
- Test compilation with various feature combinations
- Ensure proper dependency resolution
- Verify binary size optimization
-
Default Configurations
- Provide sensible defaults
- Document recommended configurations
- Test startup with various configurations
Release Process
-
Versioning
- We follow Semantic Versioning
- Breaking changes increment the major version
- New features increment the minor version
- Bug fixes increment the patch version
-
Release Preparation
- Update version numbers
- Update CHANGELOG.md
- Create a release branch
- Run final tests
-
Publishing
- Tag the release
- Create release notes
- Publish to crates.io
- Announce to the community
-
Post-Release
- Monitor for issues
- Update documentation website
- Plan next release
Troubleshooting Common Issues
Build Failures
If you encounter build failures:
- Update dependencies:
cargo update
- Clean build artifacts:
cargo clean
- Check for compatibility issues between dependencies
- Verify your Rust version:
rustc --version
Test Failures
If tests are failing:
- Run specific failing tests with verbose output:
cargo test test_name -- --nocapture
- Check for environment-specific issues
- Verify test dependencies are installed
- Check for race conditions in async tests
Performance Issues
If you encounter performance issues:
- Profile with
cargo flamegraph
- Check for memory leaks with appropriate tools
- Look for inefficient algorithms or data structures
- Consider parallelization opportunities